Re: AAR Fiberglass Hood Scoop vs. VFN
[Re: JACKSON]
#501563
10/19/09 07:37 PM
10/19/09 07:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,104 Wheels up, MO
nhramark
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,104
Wheels up, MO
|
A lot of guys on here like AAR so they must be pretty good. I own a VFN hood and could not be happier. I got it on schedule and it fit right out of the box. We literally drilled the holes for the dzus fasteners and put it on the car, no trimming needed at all. They were very nice to deal with also, so I always suggest VFN when asked.
[image]http://s1126.photobucket.com/user/nhramark1/library/Racing[/image]
9.100 @ 150 mph
5.780 @ 120 mph
|
|
|
Re: AAR Fiberglass Hood Scoop vs. VFN
[Re: nhramark]
#501564
10/19/09 08:03 PM
10/19/09 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,226 Park Forest, IL
slantzilla
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,226
Park Forest, IL
|
I have AAR fenders for my Duster and Glasstek everything else. The quality is about equal to Glasstek's. Not sure the quality is that much better for the price.
I've got a buddy who got a ton of stuff from VFN and has been very happy with it too.
"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
|
|
|
Re: AAR Fiberglass Hood Scoop vs. VFN
[Re: nhramark]
#501565
10/19/09 08:04 PM
10/19/09 08:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 437 south central pa
bdaz smblk
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 437
south central pa
|
My dad had a vfn and I have a aar and the vfn is just as nice and is lighter.
3120lb, small block, 10.5" tire, NA, through exhaust, full int, WITH 83/4 REAR, 9.0 at 150mph
|
|
|
Re: AAR Fiberglass Hood Scoop vs. VFN
[Re: nhramark]
#501568
10/20/09 08:55 AM
10/20/09 08:55 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,085 Mo.
racerx
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,085
Mo.
|
Quote:
A lot of guys on here like AAR so they must be pretty good. I own a VFN hood and could not be happier. I got it on schedule and it fit right out of the box. We literally drilled the holes for the dzus fasteners and put it on the car, no trimming needed at all.
They were very nice to deal with also, so I always suggest VFN when asked.
what he said.
|
|
|
Re: AAR Fiberglass Hood Scoop vs. VFN
[Re: JACKSON]
#501571
10/20/09 09:42 AM
10/20/09 09:42 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 554 WI.
Scotts71chall
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 554
WI.
|
Front challenger bumper from AAR, one end was bent in, they said it gets like that from taking it out of the mold. They said what do expect, its fiberglass, live with it. Very thin, poor finish overall. I bought it from them and had it shipped here because everyone on here talked so highly of them. I could have drove to VFN or Glasstek, saved $$ and a better product.
|
|
|
Re: AAR Fiberglass Hood Scoop vs. VFN
[Re: JACKSON]
#501575
10/21/09 07:04 AM
10/21/09 07:04 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,432 NorCal
RylisPro
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,432
NorCal
|
what about Glasstek vs. VFN? I want to get a lower front panel, upper front panel and fenders for an Ebody `Cuda Glasstek ends up costing 135 bucks more but maybe because VFN makes lighter weight parts? I know both are good companies. I have a Glasstek trunk lid and leaning towards them just want to justify the price difference thanks
|
|
|
|
|